The lawlessness of the FDA,
Big Pharma immunity, and crimes against humanity
(opinion)
Posted Thursday, June 29,
2006 by
Mike Adams, Key concepts: the FDA,
Big Pharma and prescription drugs.
Print this article Permalink:
http://www.NewsTarget.com/019497.html
|
|
June
30, 2006 is a day that will be long remembered as a dark
milestone in the history of FDA and its campaign against health
consumers. On June 30, an FDA "Final Rule" goes into effect,
establishing a regulatory power grab of such scale and scope
that it attempts to bypass all laws, the will of Congress and
fundamental protections for consumers. This "Final Rule," which
may as well be called a "Final Solution" for drug consumers,
claims that consumers can no longer sue drug companies for the
harm caused by any FDA-approved drug, even if the drug's
manufacturer intentionally misled
the FDA by
hiding or fabricating clinical trial data.
In one blatantly illegal act, the FDA is attempting to pull
off the greatest
Big Pharma
coup of all: The outright elimination of any responsibility
whatsoever for the suffering and death caused by deadly
pharmaceuticals.
In the preamble of the FDA's new "Final Rule" to take effect
on June 30, the agency asserts that FDA approval of
prescription drugs -- and their implied safety -- may no
longer be second-guessed by consumers or organizations of any
kind. The FDA's stamp of approval, the agency claims, is an
absolute declaration of safety of all such drugs, for any use
whatsoever, including off-label use (the use of drugs on health
conditions that were never tested in clinical trials).
But such a position has no basis in law. During a June 6,
2006 hearing, a New Jersey state court judge Carol E. Higbee
characterized the FDA's preamble as, "a political statement by
the FDA" and explained that the ploy has, "...nothing to do with
science. ...It is contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court's
decisions. It is contrary to all the law on preemption. ... In
addition to being contrary to the law of the land, it is also
contrary to the Constitution of the
United
States."
The FDA is dangerous to America
That this outrageous assertion by the FDA would take place at a
time when so many Americans are routinely killed by the harmful
side
effects of prescription drugs only contributes to the
arrogance and absurdity of this rogue agency that has now become
the No. 1 threat to the health and safety of the
American people. Even a terrorist nuclear attack on a major
U.S. city would not equal the number of Americans who have
already been killed by the negligent actions of the FDA
|
FDA-approved
prescription drugs injure 2.2 million and kill
approximately 100,000 Americans each year,
according to peer-reviewed published studies,
and more realistic estimates put the number of
deaths at over 200,000 people annually in the
United States alone (see
Death By Medicine for detailed statistics).
Vioxx, according to senior FDA drug safety
researcher Dr.
David Graham, appears responsible for the
deaths of over 60,000 Americans, and further
deaths due to beta blockers, antidepressant
drugs, statins and other medications continue to
mount by the hour.
The resulting FDA body count of American
casualties makes the casualties of war look
small in comparison. The Vietnam War claimed the
lives of approximately 50,000 Americans (plus
many more Vietnamese), and a memorial in
Washington D.C. honors those who died. But
FDA-approved prescription drugs have killed well
over a million Americans, yet no memorial
will be built, no honors bestowed, and now the
FDA would deny the families of those victims
their legal right to fight for any sort of
compensation.
It's not like these consumers were killed by
enemy gunfire in a foreign land; they were
killed by American companies, on American soil,
with the full permission and approval of an
American regulatory agency! The enemy from
within is, indeed, far more dangerous than any
foreign threat to the lives of American
citizens. Not since World War II have so many
Americans died from a single, common,
preventable cause, and it almost seems that
the FDA has declared war on the American people
and is using chemical weapons to win that war.
The scourge of dangerous prescription drugs,
combined with willful collusion at the FDA, has
now created a chemical
holocaust on U.S. soil that will
continue to claim the lives of mothers, fathers,
daughters and sons until the American people
demand that justice be served and that the FDA /
pharmaceutical industrial complex be dismantled
and condemned through some modern-day equivalent
of the Nuremberg Trials. How many millions more
have to die from this chemical holocaust before
this reign of medical
terror is brought to an end? |
|
The ramifications of the FDA's Final Rule
The FDA's new "Final Rule" would allow
drug companies to operate with impunity,
shouldering absolutely no responsibility for the
harmful (even fatal) side effects of their
prescription drugs, many of which we are now
learning were only approved under highly
suspicious circumstances that smack of fraud,
corruption and outright criminal intent.
Consumers harmed or killed by toxic prescription
drugs -- even drugs that their manufacturers
knew were extremely dangerous -- would have no
recourse whatsoever.
If such a rule were to go unchallenged, the
degree of profiteering by Big Pharma would be
unprecedented. Free to charge monopoly prices
thanks to the FDA-enforced domestic drug racket
that outlaws international competition, and
unburdened by the financial risk of
lawsuits from consumers harmed by their
drugs, Big Pharma would be emboldened to unleash
a dystopian era of unprecedented disease
mongering,
bribery of doctors, false
advertising and the mass drugging of
children, adults and seniors alike... with
absolutely nothing to hold them in check.
This result may, in fact, have been the
intention all along. This "Final Rule" appears
to be little more than a thinly-veiled attempt
to establish wide-ranging authority where none
exists by burying it in the language of a drug
labeling rule. A more detailed legal
criticism is offered by Karen Barth Menzies, an
attorney at Baum Hedlund in Los Angeles:
On Wednesday, Jan.18, 2006, the
Food and Drug Administration issued new
regulations regarding the labeling of
prescription drugs, including regulations aimed
at providing
doctors and patients with clearer
information about the risks associated with
prescription drugs. However, in the preamble to
these new regulations, the FDA inserted
conclusory and legally unsupported statements
that tort lawsuits alleging a failure to warn of
known or reasonably knowable safety risks are
preempted by federal law. This attempted
power-grab by the FDA wholly ignores the
prerogative of Congress, contradicts both
statutory and case law precedent, disregards the
parallel but distinct roles played by FDA and
tort liability law, fails to provide an avenue
through which consumers may be compensated for
drug-induced injury, neglects any federal
replacement of applicable state policing and
enforcement procedures, and shirks
constitutionally established principles of
federalism which protect the jurisdiction
granted to states in matters involving
public safety and health. By inserting
preemption language into the Final Rule without
an official consultation with state and local
government groups concerning the preemption
language, the FDA also violated Executive Order
(E.O.)13132. (When an Executive department or
agency proposes to act through adjudication or
rule-making to preempt State law, the department
or agency shall provide all affected States
notice and an opportunity for appropriate
participation in the proceedings. Exec. Order
No. 13132, [[4(e), 64 Fed.Reg. 43255, 43257
(1999). According to the National Conference of
State Legislatures (NCSL), the preemption
language inserted into the preamble of the Final
Rule is a thinly veiled attempt on the part of
FDA to confer upon itself authority it does not
have by statute and does not have by way of
judicial ruling. The NCSL called FDA s action an
abuse of agency process and a complete disregard
for our dual system of government. |
|
The fallout of the FDA's "Final Solution"
The ramifications of this "Final Rule" action by
the FDA cannot be overstated. If this rule is
allowed to stand, it represents the end of
health justice, the end of the power of
Congress, and the surrender of absolute power to
an agency of such arrogance and evil that it has
conducted armed raids on vitamin clinics,
organized the raid of a church, and even ordered
the destruction of recipe books it didn't want
to see published. (Supporting documents are
available for all of these statements).
The FDA, through its willful negligence, is
indirectly responsible for the deaths of more
Americans than all terrorists, murderers and
drunk drivers combined. As the deaths
continue to mount, and drug companies become
even more aggressive with outlandish disease
mongering and advertising efforts, the FDA rears
up to unleash a new wave of corporate terrorism
upon the American people by emboldening drug
companies to care even less about the safety of
their synthetic chemical products, most of which
cause harm by their very nature of being foreign
to the human body. |
|
| As Menzies
explains:
Pharmaceutical industry lobbying efforts
and zealot tort reformers have sired a new wave
of brazen attempts to shield
drug manufacturers from tort liability. The
preemption language in the preamble to the Final
Rule is but the latest attempt. Preemption has
become the argument du jour and politically
appointed regulatory officials the mouthpieces.
The crafty messages sound of consumer
protection, but are just the opposite. Limiting
the liability of drug companies will not improve
public safety. The FDA's purported position on
preemption assumes that the FDA is infallible
and that negligent misconduct by pharmaceutical
companies should be the sole purview of FDA.
Recent regulatory failures demonstrate that FDA
is neither infallible nor does it have the
capability of policing drug manufacturers
negligent misconduct. |
|
Want to see the real FDA at work?
Read the story of Rezulin, and you'll be shocked to learn
the truth about the real agenda that drives this rogue agency.
The end is near for the Big Pharma / FDA
racket
Why would the FDA engage in such an obviously
unlawful power grab? Because Big Pharma
co-conspirators have realized that lawsuits
threaten to bankrupt the drug companies. The
products of these companies are so universally
harmful, and their ability to hide this truth is
slipping away so rapidly, that the financial
burden of settling lawsuits (or defending them
in court) threatens to crush the entire
pharmaceutical empire.
Merck alone is defending itself against
literally thousands of lawsuits from just one
drug: Vioxx. As the truth emerges about the
dangerous side effects from the long-term use of
other widely-prescribed drugs,
class action lawsuits will reach a momentum
that will make the Big Tobacco settlements seem
like a friendly game of Friday-night poker.
Truth be told, there is not enough money
in the world to pay for all the pain, suffering
and death that has already been caused by
prescription drugs, and if drug companies
are held responsible for even a small fraction
of the patients their products have harmed and
killed, they will rapidly fall from the most
wealthy corporations in the world to the most
bankrupt, both financially and morally.
And so the FDA is jumping in with one last,
desperate attempt to cast a spell of immunity
over all drug companies in order to preempt the
coming flood of class action lawsuits. But even
this effort will fail, as the truth about the
dangers of prescription drugs can no longer be
censored. Through a tidal wave of new books,
documentaries and health websites, consumers are
learning the shocking truth about Big Pharma and
the FDA, and the beginning of the end of the age
of chemical medicine is already under way. |
|
|
Reading
suggestions: The Truth About the Drug
Companies by Marcia Angell, M.D.,
Psyched Out by Kelly Patricia O'Meara, or
Death by Prescription by Ray Strand.
You see, the arrogance and greed of drug
companies will ultimately be their downfall.
They have pushed too hard, too far, and they
have landed themselves in a realm of such
obvious scientific fraud and criminal negligence
that the backlash is inevitable. The rampant
disease mongering, the mass drugging of
schoolchildren with amphetamines, the false
claims of drug ads, the bribery of doctors, the
collusion at the FDA... it's all coming to the
surface now, and by the time this house of cards
comes tumbling down, the resulting criminal
trials against drug company executives and FDA
officials will make the Enron trials sound like
a high school debate.
It is not only inevitable that drug company
executives and FDA senior officials will do
prison time for their
crimes against humanity, it is important
that they be loudly condemned via such
punishments for knowingly defrauding,
harming and ultimately killing countless
Americans in exchange for one thing: Corporate
profits.
American medicine is now the shame of the
world, and the conduct of senior officials at
the FDA is nothing less than criminal. There is
now no greater threat to the health and safety
of the American people than the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration.
"As currently configured, the FDA is not
able to adequately protect the American public.
It's more interested in protecting the interests
of industry. It views industry as its client,
and the client is someone whose interest you
represent."
- Dr. David Graham, senior
drug safety researcher at the Food and Drug
Administration, and Vioxx whistleblower |
|
Link back to
this article: http://www.NewsTarget.com/019497.html
Reprint this article:
Non-commercial permission granted (must cite
source and provide link). Commercial use OK
with permission.
Support our efforts by
browsing our books and guides at
TruthPublishing.com. Book sales support this
network and keep articles free!
|
|
|
|